Last Monday was
#WorldAidsDay, a date first held in 1988 “for people worldwide to unite in the
fight against HIV, show their support for people living with HIV and to
commemorate people who have died” (World Aids Day.org, 2014). Governments and NGOs, celebrities
and ordinary people around the world remembered the day with posts on social
media and messages on the internet. Although there are some similarities, it is
interesting to notice how differently people address the same issue by framing
their messages in diverse ways.
The Executive
Director of UNAIDS delivered his message in the World
Aids Day using the frame a world free
of Aids is possible. The same frame was used by President Obama. Since both videos
were produced to represent political institutions, a certain level of accountability in their content is expected. In
this sense, it is possible to infer that the need to justify their actions to the
public may explain the use of the same frame.
In common, the
two videos emphasizes that – although there is much that still have to be done
– we are on the right track, since there is a hope that the world is going to
be free of Aids in a near future. While the Executive Director of UNAIDS is assertive and affirms that “together we can end Aids epidemic by 2030”,
the President Obama is more cautious and says “lets recommit ourselves to
achieving an Aids free generation in our life times”.
However, the
messages on the internet on 1 December was not only about optimism. Another
frame used was the importance of fight against stigma, which emphasizes that prejudice
may keep HIV patients away from treatment. This frame is used in campaigns such as the one promoted by Jared Leto and in posts like this one of Open Society Foundations.
Through this
frame, Aids is seen not only as a health issue but as a social issue as well.
According to those campaigners, due the stigma, some HIV’s patients loose their
jobs and need to stop their treatment, while other people even initiate their
medical care because they are afraid to share their secret. This reality also motivated
Prince Harry to launch a campaign that was quite
commented in the media in the UK.
A third frame that
this blog have identified is awareness save lives. Through this approach, the
Brazilian Ministry of Health, for example, is encouraging people to get tests in order to find out if they have the disease and, as consequence, start
the treatment as soon as possible. In addition, the awareness of the disease is
a way to stop the contamination, since people may be more careful and curb the spread
of virus.
I protect myself, I have myself tested, I move on. #goingtotest
Source: http://ow.ly/i/7M8RQ
|
The multiplicity of frames in 2014 World Aids Day, rather than causes confusion, may complement each other. The most important thing is the social responsibility that they involve. Campaigners need
to be careful when choosing frames, since they “enable individuals to
locate, perceive, identify and label occurrences within their life space and
the world at large” (Goffman cited in David et all, 1986). Frames as Aids
kills used in an Australian campaign of 1987, for example, just
trigger homophobic
attitudes and fear. "What we found at the time was a lot of people with
very low risk went and got tested while high-risk people were too scared after
the ad."(Cairns Sexual Health Service director in Herald Sun, 2012)
Therefore, one same issue may be framed in many different ways. In this post, it was identified and analysed only a few of the many possibilities in framing Aids. Despite its diversity, it
is interesting to notice that in the 2014 World Aids Day, Aids is not being
considered as something scary (a person can live with Aids. What this person
need is treatment and respect). The disease is being framed, above of all, as
something that you need to be aware.
References:
Russel, D. (2012) in Herald Sun. Available at <http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/national/notorious-1987-aids-ad-returns-in-gentler-reincarnation/story-fndo45r1-1226457971283?nk=e0a5bcd1bb7d3800b022239e0a6f0a30> Accessed at 4/12/14.
World Aids Day.org (2014) Available at <http://www.worldaidsday.org/about-world-aids-day.php> Accessed at 4/12/14
I saw the campaign that Prince Harry led on and thought it was interesting in the context of what we were studying because it's theory of change was literally around telling stories to reduce stigma and raise awareness.
ReplyDeleteAlthough, I'm not sure Harry's admission that he was afraid of public speaking really measures up to the stigma and fear that HIV-positive people and those with AIDS must experience (probably because of the fearmongering of both the campaigns you mentioned and general public discourse...). I'm not convinced the means and end of the campaign match up.
While I think some could accuse the campaign of trivialising the issue slightly (popstar Joss Stone 'admitted' she loves service stations!!), I do think telling stories is a really powerful way to get media attention and get into the public imagination. In this case there was also the added interest due to the royal element of course!
It's great to see positive framing of aids that doesn't place so much stigma upon suffers. I suppose one of the first steps towards the positive framing of Aid was the move away from understanding it as a 'gay disease' and more a matter of public health which also effects women and children. Aid awareness was practice through the media via a campaign of fear, the bi-product of this being fear of the suffers themselves. It good to see people living with Aids not being defined solely by the disease.
ReplyDelete